McLennan v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McLennan v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.

305 A.D.2d 264, 758 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5719

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 264 (McLennan v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLennan v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc., 305 A.D.2d 264, 758 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered December 10, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff customer in defendant’s store, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Issues of fact exist as to whether, inter alia, plaintiff tripped over a box in an aisle of the store, and, if so, whether defendant’s employee placed the box behind plaintiff after she entered the aisle and whether plaintiff should have observed it (see Pinero v Rite Aid, 294 AD2d 251, 252 [2002], affd 99 NY2d 541 [2002]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Wallach and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered December 10, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff customer in defendant’s store, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Issues of fact exist as to whether, inter alia, plaintiff tripped over a box in an aisle of the store, and, if so, whether defendant’s employee placed the box behind plaintiff after she entered the aisle and whether plaintiff should have observed it (see Pinero v Rite Aid, 294 AD2d 251, 252 [2002], affd 99 NY2d 541 [2002]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Wallach and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 264, 758 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclennan-v-rite-aid-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack