McLendon v. State

118 S.E. 608, 30 Ga. App. 662, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 603
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1923
Docket14705
StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 608 (McLendon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLendon v. State, 118 S.E. 608, 30 Ga. App. 662, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Ho error of law is complained of; the evidence authorized the verdict, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. King & Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Claude C. Smith, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 608, 30 Ga. App. 662, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclendon-v-state-gactapp-1923.