McLendon v. McLendon
This text of 70 Ga. App. 664 (McLendon v. McLendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action on a foreign judgment for alimony the introduction of a properly authenticated copy of the judgment sued on makes out a prima facie case, McLendon v. McLendon, 66 Ga. App. 156 (17 S. E. 2d, 252), and cit., and in the absence of any evidence that there had been any modification of the judgment, or that the plaintiff had remarried, and in the absence of any other defense, no issue was presented for the jury to decide, and it was not error for the court to direct a verdict. The foreign judgment in the instant case was authenticated as provided by the Code, § 38-627; U. S. C. A. Title 28, § 687, and it was not error for the court to allow the same in evidence. No other errors of law are complained of and the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 Ga. App. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclendon-v-mclendon-gactapp-1944.