Mclendon v. Hopkins

• Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
• Decided: November 30, 2023
• Docket: 2:23-cv-00013
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION

AARON PAUL McLENDON PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-13-TBM-RPM

DON HOPKINS and JEROME JACKSON DEFENDANTS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the submission of the Report and Recommendation [22] entered by United States Magistrate Robert P. Myers on November 2, 2023. Judge Myers recommends granting the Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [20] and dismissing McLendon’s claims with prejudice to their being asserted again until the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met. McLendon has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing an objection has expired.1 “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition (citations omitted); see Casas v. Aduddell, 404 F. App’x 879, 881 (5th Cir. 2010) (“When a party fails timely to file written objections to the magistrate judge’s proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation, that party is barred from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed findings and conclusions which the district court accepted, except for plain error”) (citing Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir.

1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation [22] was mailed to McLendon at the address listed on the docket on November 2, 2023. Although it is McLendon’s responsibility to notify the Court of any address changes, a copy of the Report and Recommendation [22] was also mailed to McLendon at Jefferson/Franklin County Correctional Facility in Fayette, Mississippi, where he is currently housed according to the Mississippi Department of Corrections. See Inmate Details, Aaron Mclendon, available at https://www.ms.gov/mdoc/inmate/Search/GetDetails/L5236 (last accessed Nov. 28, 2023). 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Having considered Judge Myers’ Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and

Recommendation [22] entered by United States Magistrate Robert P. Myers on November 2, 2023, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the claims asserted in Aaron Paul McLendon’s Complaint [1] are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their being asserted again until the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met. THIS, the 30th day of November, 2023.

_____________________________ TAYLOR B. McNEEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE