McLendon v. Hollingsworth

Fourth Circuit

McLendon v. Hollingsworth

214 F. App'x 331

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2007·No. No. 06-7444·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Juan P. McLendon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLendon v. Hollingsworth, No. 1:06-cv-01827-AMD (D.Md. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[332]*332fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Juan P. McLendon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLendon v. Hollingsworth, No. 1:06-cv-01827-AMD (D.Md. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[332]*332fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McLendon v. Hollingsworth, 214 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

214 F. App'x 331 (McLendon v. Hollingsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related