McLemore v. McLemore

537 So. 2d 675, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 245, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 247, 1989 WL 3894
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1989·No. No. 88-703·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

Klenton McLemore appeals from a final order awarding child support, alimony and distribution of marital assets. We hold that the trial court’s awards of child support and alimony satisfy the reasonableness test enunciated in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). However, the distribution of marital property pursuant to paragraph ten is unclear and inconsistent with the alimony award. Therefore, we reverse and remand for clarification and further distribution of real property pursuant to paragraph ten of the final order.

Additionally, we provisionally grant ap-pellee’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal and remand to the trial court for determination of a reasonable fee amount, in accordance with the rationale of Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLemore v. McLemore, 537 So. 2d 675, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 245, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 247, 1989 WL 3894 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

537 So. 2d 675 (McLemore v. McLemore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLemore v. McLemore
567 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)