McLean v. Warden

599 F. App'x 78
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2015·No. No. 14-7479·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Edward McLean, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition as successive under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLean v. Warden, No. 9:13-cv-03022-MGL, 2014 WL 4954882 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLean v. Warden, 599 F. App'x 78 (4th Cir. 2015).

599 F. App'x 78 (McLean v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cain v. Streeval
W.D. Virginia, 2022
Hill v. Streeval
W.D. Virginia, 2022
Santiago v. Warden
W.D. Virginia, 2022
Edwards v. Hutchinson
D. South Carolina, 2021
McLean v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
W.D. North Carolina, 2020