McLean v. . Waddell

50 N.C. 137
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1857
StatusPublished

This text of 50 N.C. 137 (McLean v. . Waddell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLean v. . Waddell, 50 N.C. 137 (N.C. 1857).

Opinion

Pearson, J.

A copy of the bill of sale is not sent. The *139 statement of the case sets out that it contained “full covenants of warranty of soundness.” "We are at a loss as to the meaning of the word full as here used. Possibly it means that there Avas a Avammty of soundness in all respects. But, however that may be, the defendant certainly has no right to complain of the charge. It would seem tlyit a “ temporary sickness on the day of sale,” for example, bilious fever, measles, Aidiooping cough, would amount to a breach of a full coAenant of soundness. Certainly, if a slave has a “ diseased liver,” and “ his abdomen is much enlarged,” whether the disease is chronic or not, and “ these affections impair his value,” he is unsound in the ordinary acceptation of the word ; Bell v. Jeffreys, 13 Ire. Rep. 356.

Peií CubiaM, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 N.C. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-waddell-nc-1857.