McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp.
This text of 275 A.D.2d 844 (McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[845]*845The plaintiff, having been nonsuited, is entitled to the benefit of every fact that the jury could have found from the evidence, in the most favorable view that a jury would be warranted in taking of that evidence, as well as every reasonable inference that may be drawn therefrom. (McNally v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 137 N. Y. 389, 394; Kraus v. Birnbaum, 200 N. Y. 130, 133; African Metals Corp. v. Bullowa, 288 N. Y. 78, 81; Pollard v. Trivia Bldg. Corp., 291 N. Y. 19, 22.) So viewed, the proof adduced was sufficient to warrant a finding by the jury that the accident occurred as alleged in the complaint and bill of particulars and there was presented a prima facie case within plaintiff’s pleadings which should not have been taken from the jury. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-triboro-coach-corp-nyappdiv-1949.