McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp.

275 A.D.2d 844

Opinion

[845]*845The plaintiff, having been nonsuited, is entitled to the benefit of every fact that the jury could have found from the evidence, in the most favorable view that a jury would be warranted in taking of that evidence, as well as every reasonable inference that may be drawn therefrom. (McNally v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 137 N. Y. 389, 394; Kraus v. Birnbaum, 200 N. Y. 130, 133; African Metals Corp. v. Bullowa, 288 N. Y. 78, 81; Pollard v. Trivia Bldg. Corp., 291 N. Y. 19, 22.) So viewed, the proof adduced was sufficient to warrant a finding by the jury that the accident occurred as alleged in the complaint and bill of particulars and there was presented a prima facie case within plaintiff’s pleadings which should not have been taken from the jury. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp., 275 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

275 A.D.2d 844 (McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pollard v. Trivia Building Corp.
50 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
McNally v. Phœnix Insurance
33 N.E. 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
African Metals Corp. v. Bullowa
41 N.E.2d 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Kraus v. . Birnbaum
93 N.E. 474 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)