McLean v. Stieneke

Fourth Circuit

McLean v. Stieneke

180 F. App'x 451

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2006·No. No. 05-7784·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael McLean appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the l'easons stated by the district court. See McLean v. Stieneke, No. CA-05-222-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2005; filed Oct. 7, 2005 & entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael McLean appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the l'easons stated by the district court. See McLean v. Stieneke, No. CA-05-222-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2005; filed Oct. 7, 2005 & entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McLean v. Stieneke, 180 F. App'x 451 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

180 F. App'x 451 (McLean v. Stieneke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.