McLean v. State

1 Shan. Cas. 474
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McLean v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Shan. Cas. 478
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1875·Published

Opinion

McFarland, J.,

delivered the -opinion ,of the court.

McLean was on trial for embezzlement. The jury having the case iu charge were, as he insists, discharged without his consent and without sufficient reasons authorizing this to be done. lie moved the court to be discharged, [475]*475which being refused, he prayed an appeal, which was -also denied. Hie now presents the record and moves for a writ of error.

This court, except in special instances, exercises- only appellate jurisdiction, and we think there was no final judgment from which a writ of error would lie.

The writ of error will he refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLean v. State, 1 Shan. Cas. 474 (Tenn. 1875).

1 Shan. Cas. 474 (McLean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.