McLean v. State

86 So. 117, 17 Ala. App. 543, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 178
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 1920
Docket4 Div. 624.
StatusPublished

This text of 86 So. 117 (McLean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLean v. State, 86 So. 117, 17 Ala. App. 543, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 178 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

■BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment, charged the defendant with a violation of the act known as the “Weakley Bone Dry Law,” and' was properly framed under section 15 of said act. Acts 1919, p. 16, § 15. In short, the defendant was indicted and convicted of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic-liquor.

The evidence was in conflict; therefore the only question presented upon this appeal, the refusal of ,the general affirmative charge for defendant, must fail, as the defendant was clearly not entitled to this charge.

The record is entirely free from all error. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 So. 117, 17 Ala. App. 543, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-state-alactapp-1920.