McLean v. McLean

Supreme Court of South Carolina

McLean v. McLean

273 S.E.2d 342, 275 S.C. 515, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 503

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 29, 1980

Docket21354

StatusPublished

This text of 273 S.E.2d 342 (McLean v. McLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLean v. McLean, 273 S.E.2d 342, 275 S.C. 515, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 503 (S.C. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends, inter alia, that the Family Court erred in requiring him to pay $250 per week child support and $2,500 of respondent’s attorney’s fees.

Review of the Order below, in conjunction with the record and briefs submitted on appeal, fails to reveal the basis upon which the Family Court reached the challenged child support and attorney fee awards. Accordingly, equity dictates that the present case be remanded to the Family Court for further delineation of the needs of the children involved and the respective financial conditions of the parties. See Witt v. Witt, [516]*516271 S. C. 541, 248 S. E. (2d) 494 (1978) (remand for determination of “conditions” upon which child support and alimony based).

The remaining issues raised on appeal, relating to appellant’s requests for division of property and alimony, are without merit and dismissed pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of Practice of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends, inter alia, that the Family Court erred in requiring him to pay $250 per week child support and $2,500 of respondent’s attorney’s fees.

Review of the Order below, in conjunction with the record and briefs submitted on appeal, fails to reveal the basis upon which the Family Court reached the challenged child support and attorney fee awards. Accordingly, equity dictates that the present case be remanded to the Family Court for further delineation of the needs of the children involved and the respective financial conditions of the parties. See Witt v. Witt, [516]*516271 S. C. 541, 248 S. E. (2d) 494 (1978) (remand for determination of “conditions” upon which child support and alimony based).

The remaining issues raised on appeal, relating to appellant’s requests for division of property and alimony, are without merit and dismissed pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of Practice of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 S.E.2d 342, 275 S.C. 515, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-mclean-sc-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack