McLean v. Jordan

Fourth Circuit

McLean v. Jordan

156 F. App'x 585

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2005·No. No. 05-6740·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dommion McLean appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no re[586]*586versible error. Accordingly, we deny McLean’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McLean v. Jordan, No. CA-04-741-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dommion McLean appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no re[586]*586versible error. Accordingly, we deny McLean’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McLean v. Jordan, No. CA-04-741-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McLean v. Jordan, 156 F. App'x 585 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

156 F. App'x 585 (McLean v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related