McLean v. Jordan
This text of McLean v. Jordan (McLean v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6740
DOMMION MCLEAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TANA JORDAN, Circuit Court Clerk,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-04-741-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 2, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dommion McLean, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dommion McLean appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny McLean’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. See McLean v. Jordan, No.
CA-04-741-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McLean v. Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-jordan-ca4-2005.