McLean v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Licensing

888 So. 2d 126, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17938, 2004 WL 2729720
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 2004·No. No. 3D04-1131·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Verizon Florida, Inc. v. Jacobs, 810 So.2d 906, 908 (Fla.2002); Heifetz v. Dep’t of Bus. Regulation, Div. of Alcohol Beverages & Tobacco, 475 So.2d 1277, 1281-82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (citing State Beverage Dep’t v. Ernal, Inc., 115 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLean v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Licensing, 888 So. 2d 126, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17938, 2004 WL 2729720 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

888 So. 2d 126 (McLean v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Licensing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verizon Florida, Inc. v. Jacobs
810 So. 2d 906 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Heifetz v. Dept. of Business Regulation
475 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
State Beverage Department v. Ernal, Inc.
115 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)