McLean v. Chipman

178 P. 849, 179 Cal. 816, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 612
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 1919
DocketS. F. No. 8897.
StatusPublished

This text of 178 P. 849 (McLean v. Chipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLean v. Chipman, 178 P. 849, 179 Cal. 816, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 612 (Cal. 1919).

Opinion

SHAW, J.

This is an appeal by Chipman and the Union Trust Co. as executors of the will of Josephine A. Phelps, deceased, from an order made in said estate in the course of the administration, upon the petition of the respondents, Edward T., Mattie, and Alfred A. McLean, and directing the executors to pay to them certain sums of money found to be due them under the will of the said decedent and to continue paying them thereafter monthly, one-third of the sums to be given to them monthly according to the provisions of the said will.

The case is practically the same in all respects, so far as the legal questions are concerned, as case No. 8821, ante, p. 703, [178 Pac. 846], in which an opinion has been written. The respondents here are the same persons named in that opinion, and their rights depend upon the same clauses in the will. The order was made upon the same theory as in the other case, and for the reasons there stated we hold it to be erroneous.

The order appealed from is reversed.

Sloss, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.

Hearing in Bank denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Phelps
178 P. 846 (California Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 P. 849, 179 Cal. 816, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-chipman-cal-1919.