McLean v. Bohannon

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 16, 2004
• Docket: 03-6997
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6997

CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT BOHANNON, Bohannon, Bohannon & Hancock, Attorneys at Law; JAMES O. BROCCOLETTI, Zoby & Broccoletti, Attorneys at Law,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-336-2)

Submitted: October 15, 2003 Decided: March 16, 2004

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See McLean v. Bohannon,

No. CA-03-336-2 (E.D. Va. May 21, 2003). We deny McLean’s motion

for attorney’s fees. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -