McLawhorn v. Wyatt

Hopewell County Circuit Court

McLawhorn v. Wyatt

11 Va. Cir. 45, 1986 Va. Cir. LEXIS 106

CourtHopewell County Circuit Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1986

DocketCase No. (Law) 86-157

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Va. Cir. 45 (McLawhorn v. Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hopewell County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLawhorn v. Wyatt, 11 Va. Cir. 45, 1986 Va. Cir. LEXIS 106 (Va. Super. Ct. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE W. PARK LEMMOND, JR.

Pursuant to a motion by Plaintiff for default judgment, and a motion by Defendant for leave to file a late answer, the Court has considered the argument presented by counsel on October 6, 1986, in chambers.

Upon deliberation of the arguments made and considering all of the factual circumstances as well as the ore tenus evidence presented, the Court denies the motion for default judgment and grants the motion by defendant to file a late answer.

In the Court's opinion, Rule 3:17 is designed to expedite the court’s business and is not intended to become an ironclad obstacle to all causes of action in all circumstances. The court is of the opinion that Rule 1:9 recognizes this principle and therefore grants the discretion to the court as stated in this rule. This discretion is necessary in order to serve the basic judicial principle that justice must be done. In attempting to effectuate this principle, the Court has considered, as stated, all relevant circumstances, and one important consideration is whether or not the Plaintiff, in this instance, has suffered any prejudice. It is abundantly clear that no prejudice whatsoever has been suffered by the Plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE W. PARK LEMMOND, JR.

Pursuant to a motion by Plaintiff for default judgment, and a motion by Defendant for leave to file a late answer, the Court has considered the argument presented by counsel on October 6, 1986, in chambers.

Upon deliberation of the arguments made and considering all of the factual circumstances as well as the ore tenus evidence presented, the Court denies the motion for default judgment and grants the motion by defendant to file a late answer.

In the Court's opinion, Rule 3:17 is designed to expedite the court’s business and is not intended to become an ironclad obstacle to all causes of action in all circumstances. The court is of the opinion that Rule 1:9 recognizes this principle and therefore grants the discretion to the court as stated in this rule. This discretion is necessary in order to serve the basic judicial principle that justice must be done. In attempting to effectuate this principle, the Court has considered, as stated, all relevant circumstances, and one important consideration is whether or not the Plaintiff, in this instance, has suffered any prejudice. It is abundantly clear that no prejudice whatsoever has been suffered by the Plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Va. Cir. 45, 1986 Va. Cir. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclawhorn-v-wyatt-vacchopewell-1986.