McLaurine, Ex Parte

63 N.C. 528
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 N.C. 528 (McLaurine, Ex Parte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLaurine, Ex Parte, 63 N.C. 528 (N.C. 1869).

Opinion

Dice:, J.

A Justice of the Peace has no jurisdiction to try a person charged with the offence of larceny. State v. Jarvis, at this term.

The defendant was, therefore, improperly convicted and imprisoned. But she has mistaken her remedy. She ought to have appealed to the Superior Court from the judgment of the Justice; or have applied to a Judge of the Superior Court or a Justice of the Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, as they have general jurisdiction in all cases of unlawful imprisonment: Act of April 6th 1869. The jurisdiction of the Special Court of Wilmington is limited to the trial of misdemeanors committed within the corporate limits of said city. City of Wilmington v. Davis, at this term. The power of the Judge of said Special Court to issue writs of habeas corpus, conferred *529 by Act of 1868, cb. 12, sec. 17, is confined to criminal cases within his jurisdiction, and cannot be extended by implication to cases which he cannot hear and determine, and he has no jurisdiction in cases of larceny. State v. Saughton, at this term.

His Honor therefore had no power to issue the writ of habeas corpus in this case, and the proceedings are dismissed.

Per Curiam. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ruffin
79 S.E. 417 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.C. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaurine-ex-parte-nc-1869.