McLaughlin v. Venine

2 Wyo. 1
Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fishee, J.

An alteration in a written instrument, whether for the payment of money or for other purposes, which does not affect the original design of the parties, either by enlarging or diminishing the obligation, however improper the alteration may be, does not invalidate the instrument, nor change the weight of the obligation, 15 Pick., 242. We do do not, therefore, find anything in the record which requires the interposition of an appellate court. Without referring to the question of the application for a new trial we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin v. Venine, 2 Wyo. 1 (Wyo. 1877).

2 Wyo. 1 (McLaughlin v. Venine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Starrett v. Shepard
606 P.2d 1247 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1980)