McLaughlin v. United States

Supreme Court

McLaughlin v. United States

251 U.S. 541, 40 S. Ct. 178, 64 L. Ed. 405, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1713

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 12, 1920·No. No. 591·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402, 410-411; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328-337; O’Neal v. United States, 190 U. S. 36, 37-38. (2) Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co., 150 U. S. 171; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89. (3) In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399-401. (4) Itow v. United States, 233 U. S. 581; Sugarman v. United States, [542]*542249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Daniel L. Cruice and Mr. Rob V. Phillips for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. A. F. Myers for the United States. Mr. Thos. H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles, by leave of court, filed a brief as amid curios.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402, 410-411; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328-337; O’Neal v. United States, 190 U. S. 36, 37-38. (2) Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co., 150 U. S. 171; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89. (3) In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399-401. (4) Itow v. United States, 233 U. S. 581; Sugarman v. United States, [542]*542249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Daniel L. Cruice and Mr. Rob V. Phillips for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. A. F. Myers for the United States. Mr. Thos. H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles, by leave of court, filed a brief as amid curios.

McLaughlin v. United States, 251 U.S. 541, 40 S. Ct. 178, 64 L. Ed. 405, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1713 (1920).

Pincite

251 U.S. 541 (McLaughlin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related