McLaughlin v. United States Parole

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1999·No. 98-1338·Unpublished

Opinion

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 1999 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk

ATHENS CARL McLAUGHLIN,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 98-1338 v. (D. Colorado) UNITED STATES PAROLE (D.C. No. 96-WM-359) COMMISSION, FCI FLORENCE, WARDEN BROOKS,

Respondents - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the *

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. Athens Carl McLaughlin, as a prisoner of the United States, unsuccessfully

challenged his parole date in the district court. He then appealed to this court by

notice of appeal dated August 31, 1998. He was released on parole on

January 28, 1999. His release on parole moots his challenge to his parole date.

See Vandenburg v. Rodgers , 801 F.2d 377, 378 (10th Cir. 1986).

DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin v. United States Parole, (10th Cir. 1999).

McLaughlin v. United States Parole (McLaughlin v. United States Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kenneth B. Vandenberg v. George H. Rodgers
801 F.2d 377 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)