McLaughlin v. Turner

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

McLaughlin v. Turner

16 F. Cas. 234, 1 Cranch 476

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F. Cas. 234 (McLaughlin v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLaughlin v. Turner, 16 F. Cas. 234, 1 Cranch 476 (circtddc 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

But

THE COURT

(nem. con.) said, if the count is bad, he might have demurred, or might move in arrest of judgment But if the count is good, there can be no question but that the evidence offered will support it.

Mr. Morsell contended also, that the plaintiff could not give in evidence any charge for articles delivered before the 4th of May, 1805, the day laid in the declaration.

But THE COURT (nem. con.) said the day was immaterial, so that the articles were de-liveredand payablebefore the action brought.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But

THE COURT

(nem. con.) said, if the count is bad, he might have demurred, or might move in arrest of judgment But if the count is good, there can be no question but that the evidence offered will support it.

Mr. Morsell contended also, that the plaintiff could not give in evidence any charge for articles delivered before the 4th of May, 1805, the day laid in the declaration.

But THE COURT (nem. con.) said the day was immaterial, so that the articles were de-liveredand payablebefore the action brought.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F. Cas. 234, 1 Cranch 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-turner-circtddc-1807.