McLaughlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McLaughlin v. State

1920 OK CR 84, 187 P. 251, 17 Okla. Crim. 714, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 16, 1920

DocketNo. A-3264.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 84 (McLaughlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLaughlin v. State, 1920 OK CR 84, 187 P. 251, 17 Okla. Crim. 714, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under an information filed in the district court of Okmulgee county, by the county attorney, charging that the defendant, Bud McLaughlin, Mike Broshears, Bill Barnes, and Charley Baker, did in said county on or about the' 2nd day of June, 1917, commit the crime of injuring and destroying public improvements, the plaintiff in error upon his separate trial was convicted, and he was by the court sentenced to serve a term of seven years in the penitentiary. Prom the judgment he appeals. The question presented in this ease is .identical with the question raised 'in the companion case of Brosh-ears v. State, reversed at th.e last term. Upon (he authority of that case and for reasons stated in the opinion therein, the judgment herein is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Under an information filed in the district court of Okmulgee county, by the county attorney, charging that the defendant, Bud McLaughlin, Mike Broshears, Bill Barnes, and Charley Baker, did in said county on or about the' 2nd day of June, 1917, commit the crime of injuring and destroying public improvements, the plaintiff in error upon his separate trial was convicted, and he was by the court sentenced to serve a term of seven years in the penitentiary. Prom the judgment he appeals. The question presented in this ease is .identical with the question raised 'in the companion case of Brosh-ears v. State, reversed at th.e last term. Upon (he authority of that case and for reasons stated in the opinion therein, the judgment herein is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 84, 187 P. 251, 17 Okla. Crim. 714, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.