McLaughlin v. State
1913 OK CR 318, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 633, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 281
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for violating the prohibitory liquor law, and appealed. The legal questions involved, in this case have already been decided adversely to the contentions of counsel for appellant. It is therefore not necessary to repeat here what has been said. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McLaughlin v. State, 1913 OK CR 318, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 633, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 281 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).
1913 OK CR 318 (McLaughlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.