McLaughlin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McLaughlin v. State

102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 688

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1925

Docket6 Div. 535.

StatusPublished

This text of 102 So. 923 (McLaughlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLaughlin v. State, 102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 688 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated in the county court of Tuscaloosa county; the specific charge being a violation of the state prohibition laws. He was convicted in the county court, and appealed to the circuit court. In the circuit court he was tried by a jury, upon a complaint filed by the solicitor, charging the same offense. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and judgment following the verdict was duly pronounced, from which judgment this appeal was taken. No points of decision are presented for the consideration of this court. The record proper, upon which the appeal is predicated, is regular in all respects, and therefore free from error. Let the judgment of conviction in the circuit court be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated in the county court of Tuscaloosa county; the specific charge being a violation of the state prohibition laws. He was convicted in the county court, and appealed to the circuit court. In the circuit court he was tried by a jury, upon a complaint filed by the solicitor, charging the same offense. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and judgment following the verdict was duly pronounced, from which judgment this appeal was taken. No points of decision are presented for the consideration of this court. The record proper, upon which the appeal is predicated, is regular in all respects, and therefore free from error. Let the judgment of conviction in the circuit court be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-state-alactapp-1925.