McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic
This text of McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic (McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[J-68-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
ALYSSA MCLAUGHLIN AND WILLIAM : No. 7WAP 2022 MCLAUGHLIN Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered July 28, V. 2021 at No. 1115 WDA 2020, affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington AMIT NAHATA, M.D.; KATHRYN SIMONS, County entered February 5, 2020 at M.D.; ANNE F. JOSIAH, M.D.; THOMAS No. 2015-3223 and remanding. PIROSKO, D.O.; JESSIE GANJOO, M.D.; ASHLEY BERKLEY, D.O.; THE : ARGUED: October 26, 2022 WASHINGTON HOSPITAL; AND WASHINGTON HEALTH SYSTEM WASHINGTON HOSPITAL
V.
DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC.
APPEAL OF: DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2023, we affirm the Superior Court's
determination on the contribution issue for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of the
Court. Because the Justices are unable to reach consensus regarding the Superior
Court's determination on the indemnification issue, the Superior Court's determination is
affirmed by operation of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-nahata-md-apl-of-dialysis-clinic-pa-2023.