McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 28, 2023·No. 7 WAP 2022·Published

Opinion

[J-68-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

ALYSSA MCLAUGHLIN AND WILLIAM : No. 7WAP 2022 MCLAUGHLIN Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered July 28, V. 2021 at No. 1115 WDA 2020, affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington AMIT NAHATA, M.D.; KATHRYN SIMONS, County entered February 5, 2020 at M.D.; ANNE F. JOSIAH, M.D.; THOMAS No. 2015-3223 and remanding. PIROSKO, D.O.; JESSIE GANJOO, M.D.; ASHLEY BERKLEY, D.O.; THE : ARGUED: October 26, 2022 WASHINGTON HOSPITAL; AND WASHINGTON HEALTH SYSTEM WASHINGTON HOSPITAL

V.

DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC.

APPEAL OF: DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2023, we affirm the Superior Court's

determination on the contribution issue for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of the

Court. Because the Justices are unable to reach consensus regarding the Superior

Court's determination on the indemnification issue, the Superior Court's determination is

affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[J-68-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

ALYSSA MCLAUGHLIN AND WILLIAM : No. 7WAP 2022 MCLAUGHLIN Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered July 28, V. 2021 at No. 1115 WDA 2020, affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington AMIT NAHATA, M.D.; KATHRYN SIMONS, County entered February 5, 2020 at M.D.; ANNE F. JOSIAH, M.D.; THOMAS No. 2015-3223 and remanding. PIROSKO, D.O.; JESSIE GANJOO, M.D.; ASHLEY BERKLEY, D.O.; THE : ARGUED: October 26, 2022 WASHINGTON HOSPITAL; AND WASHINGTON HEALTH SYSTEM WASHINGTON HOSPITAL

V.

DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC.

APPEAL OF: DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2023, we affirm the Superior Court's

determination on the contribution issue for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of the

Court. Because the Justices are unable to reach consensus regarding the Superior

Court's determination on the indemnification issue, the Superior Court's determination is

affirmed by operation of law.

McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic, (Pa. 2023).

Pincite

McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic (McLaughlin v. Nahata, M.D. Apl of: Dialysis Clinic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.