McLaughlin v. Miami-Dade County
This text of 895 So. 2d 1285 (McLaughlin v. Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because, as a matter of law, the only occurrence of record during the year prior to dismissal, that is, the filing of a notice of appearance by counsel for defendant, does not constitute record activity sufficient to avoid the effect of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), Nesbitt v. Cmty. Health of S. Dade, Inc., 566 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Nat’l Enters., Inc. v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc., 777 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(rehearing en banc); Moransais v. Jordan, 870 So.2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), the order of dismissal is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
895 So. 2d 1285, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4470, 2005 WL 662666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2005.