McLaughlin v. Miami-Dade County

895 So. 2d 1285, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4470, 2005 WL 662666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2005·No. No. 3D04-1685·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because, as a matter of law, the only occurrence of record during the year prior to dismissal, that is, the filing of a notice of appearance by counsel for defendant, does not constitute record activity sufficient to avoid the effect of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), Nesbitt v. Cmty. Health of S. Dade, Inc., 566 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Nat’l Enters., Inc. v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc., 777 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(rehearing en banc); Moransais v. Jordan, 870 So.2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), the order of dismissal is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin v. Miami-Dade County, 895 So. 2d 1285, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4470, 2005 WL 662666 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

895 So. 2d 1285 (McLaughlin v. Miami-Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NEI v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc.
777 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Nesbitt v. COMMUNITY HEALTH OF SO. DADE, INC.
566 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Moransais v. Jordan
870 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)