McLaughlin v. Coffey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

McLaughlin v. Coffey

293 S.W.2d 455, 226 Ark. 716, 1956 Ark. LEXIS 552

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 2, 1956

Docket1041

StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.W.2d 455 (McLaughlin v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLaughlin v. Coffey, 293 S.W.2d 455, 226 Ark. 716, 1956 Ark. LEXIS 552 (Ark. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant did not file the assent required by Sub-section 2 of Section 27-2101 Ark. Stats., and it is too late to file it now. (See Osborn v. LeMaire, 82 Ark. 490, 102 S. W. 372.) The appeal is dismissed for lack of final judgment; and the case is still pending in the Garland Circuit Court for new trial on all issues. Mr. Justice Robinson dissents because he thinks that the appellant should be allowed to file the assent at this time in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appellant did not file the assent required by Sub-section 2 of Section 27-2101 Ark. Stats., and it is too late to file it now. (See Osborn v. LeMaire, 82 Ark. 490, 102 S. W. 372.) The appeal is dismissed for lack of final judgment; and the case is still pending in the Garland Circuit Court for new trial on all issues. Mr. Justice Robinson dissents because he thinks that the appellant should be allowed to file the assent at this time in this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 S.W.2d 455, 226 Ark. 716, 1956 Ark. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-coffey-ark-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack