McLaughlin v. Bascomb

36 Iowa 593
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 16, 1873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Day, J.

— This is an action of slander To the petition the defendant demurred, as follows: “And now comes the defendant, James Baseom, and demurs to the plaintiff’s amended petition, for the reason that the matters therein stated and contained are not sufficient to cciñ'stitute a cause of action against him.” This demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

We do not inquire whether the petition sets forth- a cause of action. The demurrer does not specify any ground of objection to the petition intended to be urged. It does not comply with-the provisions of section 2877 of the Revision. It should have been disregarded by the court. McKellar v. Stout, 13 Iowa, 487.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin v. Bascomb, 36 Iowa 593 (iowa 1873).

36 Iowa 593 (McLaughlin v. Bascomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slafter v. Concordia Fire Insurance
120 N.W. 706 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1909)
Stokes v. Sprague
81 N.W. 195 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)
Estate of McMurray v. McMurray
107 Iowa 648 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)