McLaughlin v. Barclays American Corp.

385 S.E.2d 498, 325 N.C. 546
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 9, 1989
Docket442P89
StatusPublished

This text of 385 S.E.2d 498 (McLaughlin v. Barclays American Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLaughlin v. Barclays American Corp., 385 S.E.2d 498, 325 N.C. 546 (N.C. 1989).

Opinion

385 S.E.2d 498 (1989)
325 N.C. 546

Leon McLAUGHLIN
v.
BARCLAYS AMERICAN CORP., d/b/a Barclays American/Financial, W.T. Tyler and Robert Ballard.

No. 442P89.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 1989.

Tate & Minor, Statesville, for plaintiff.

Elarbee, Thompson & Trapnell, Atlanta, Ga., Petree, Stockton & Robinson, for defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of November 1989."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 S.E.2d 498, 325 N.C. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-barclays-american-corp-nc-1989.