McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company
This text of 168 N.E. 407 (McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig (227 N. Y. 291); Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. (229 N. Y. 97); Braxton v. *508 Mendelson (233 N. Y. 122); Charles v. Barrett (233 N. Y. 127); Meade v. Motor Haulage Co., Inc. (233 N. Y. 527); Cattini v. American Railway Express Co. (234 N. Y. 585); Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co.,Inc. (245 N. Y. 66).
Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 N.E. 407, 251 N.Y. 507, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-audley-clarke-company-ny-1929.