McLaren v. Panetta

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 13, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-1525
StatusPublished

This text of McLaren v. Panetta (McLaren v. Panetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLaren v. Panetta, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

FILED AUG 13 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts

Douglas McLaren, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09 1525 ) Leon Edward Panetta, CIA Director, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before this court on the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis,

pro se complaint, motion for immediate injunction, motion to seal, and motion for appointed

legal counsel. The court will grant the application, dismiss the complaint because it fails to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted against this defendant, and deny all pending motions as

moot.

The complaint seeks "immediate relief of phys[ic]al, civil momentary harm," Complaint

at 2, and 4.7 trillion dollars in damages, id at 4. The remainder ofthe four pages of the

complaint consists of incoherent phrases and terms, such as the following:

Religious persecution, political persecution, difirmation [sic], slander, criminal slander, discrim[in]ation, racism, reverse racism discrim[in]ation. Sexual harassment harassment, invasion of privacy invasion criminal invasion of privacy violation of domain, to violations of sovereign domain. Invasion of domain of legal filings, retal[ia]tory acts. Interference with legal filings ....

Id at 2.

This court is obligated by federal law to dismiss a complaint that is filed without

prepayment of filing fees whenever it determines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Here, the complaint does not

contain any factual allegations to establish that the plaintiff has suffered an injury attributable to

the defendant. In fact, the defendant is not mentioned by name or reference outside the caption

of the complaint. Accordingly, the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief may be

granted against the defendant, and the court will dismiss the complaint.

An appropriate order accompanies this memorand

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McLaren v. Panetta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaren-v-panetta-dcd-2009.