McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n
137 S. Ct. 461, 196 L. Ed. 2d 339, 85 U.S.L.W. 3227, 2016 WL 6601978, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6810
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 8, 2016·No. No. 15–1248.·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Stephen B. Kinnaird, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the position that a district court's decision to quash or enforce an EEOC subpoena is subject to de novo review. Briefs of other amici curiae in support of the judgment below are to be filed within 7 days of the filing of the brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 461, 196 L. Ed. 2d 339, 85 U.S.L.W. 3227, 2016 WL 6601978, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6810 (U.S. 2016).
137 S. Ct. 461 (McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Sineneng-Smith
140 S. Ct. 1575 (Supreme Court, 2020)
McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n
581 U.S. 72 (Supreme Court, 2017)