McLamb v. Stansberry

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 6, 2005
• Docket: 04-7814
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7814

THOMAS LATTIE MCLAMB,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner, North Carolina,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-600-5-FL)

Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 6, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Lattie McLamb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Thomas Lattie McLamb, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See McLamb v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-600-5-FL

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2004). We grant McLamb’s motion to file a

document styled as a formal brief, and we have considered the

arguments therein. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -