McLamb v. Stansberry

133 F. App'x 77
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2005·No. No. 04-7814·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Lattie McLamb, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McLamb v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-600-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2004). We grant McLamb’s motion to file a document styled as a formal brief, and we have considered the arguments therein. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLamb v. Stansberry, 133 F. App'x 77 (4th Cir. 2005).

133 F. App'x 77 (McLamb v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241