McLain v. British & Foreign Marine Ins.
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 827 (McLain v. British & Foreign Marine Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have given this case very careful study, and think that the various objections claimed by the appellant have been met, and the case was correctly submitted to the jury. The complaint was proper in form, and sufficiently complied with claim of appellant. See Code Civ. Proc. § 533. The authority cited by [829]*829appellant as controlling this case, to wit, Van Wickle v. Insurance Co., 97 N. Y. 350, 353, is distinguished in the case oí Singleton v. Insurance Co., 132 N. Y. 298, 303, 304, 30 N. E. 839, and in our judgment meets this case.
We find no errors, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 N.Y.S. 827, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclain-v-british-foreign-marine-ins-nynyccityct-1895.