McLachlan v. People
This text of 436 P.2d 353 (McLachlan v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Plaintiff in error was named defendant in a two-count information in which he was accused of (1) an assault with intent to commit rape; and (2) committing an act of “unnatural carnal knowledge.”
Upon trial to a jury he was found guilty on both charges and was sentenced to the state penitentiary for [557]*557a term of from eighteen months to five years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently.
The only point relied on for reversal of either judgment is that, with reference to the count charging assault with intent to commit rape, there was no evidence sufficient to justify submission of that question to the jury, and that the motion made by counsel for a directed verdict thereon should have been sustained. We have read the record and find no merit to this argument.
The judgments are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 P.2d 353, 164 Colo. 556, 1968 Colo. LEXIS 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclachlan-v-people-colo-1968.