McKown's Estate

47 A. 1111, 198 Pa. 96, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 740
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1901·No. No. 1; Appeal, No. 77·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are not convinced of error in any of the assignments filed on this appeal. All the questions raised by them were thoroughly discussed and carefully considered by counsel and court previous to the appeal, and the conclusion arrived at was against the appellant’s contention. In the opinion of the court on exceptions the principal matter passed upon was the appellant’s claim to the policy issued in 1888. The claim was rejected and held to be in fraud of the creditors. In this we discover no error, and in connection with it we may add that we find nothing in the decree appealed from which requires a reversal or modification.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKown's Estate, 47 A. 1111, 198 Pa. 96, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 740 (Pa. 1901).

47 A. 1111 (McKown's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pearlman v. Commissioner
4 T.C. 34 (U.S. Tax Court, 1944)
The Prudential Insurance Co. v. Beck
103 P.2d 241 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Union Central Life Ins. v. Flicker
101 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1939)
Bryson v. Manhart
54 P.2d 778 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Stutzman v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
172 A. 302 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National Bank
169 A. 209 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Huff's Estate
149 A. 179 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)