McKnight v. State

1914 OK CR 51, 137 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 668, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 12, 1914
DocketNo. A-1606.
StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 51 (McKnight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKnight v. State, 1914 OK CR 51, 137 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 668, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles McKnight, was convicted of vagrancy in the county court of Pottawatomie county, and the judgment and sentence of the court was that ho pay a fine of one hundred dollars. Error is assigned upon the ruling of the court in admitting evidence that the defendant’s general reputation was that of a professional gambler. This is a companion case to the case of Mitchell v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 172, 130 Pac. 1175, and the record presents the same questions of law. Por the reasons set forth in the opinion in that ease, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. State
1913 OK CR 89 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK CR 51, 137 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 668, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.