McKnight v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McKnight v. State

61 Ga. App. 605

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 31, 1940

Docket28019

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Ga. App. 605 (McKnight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKnight v. State, 61 Ga. App. 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of possessing whisky in violation of the prohibition law (Code, §§ 58-101-58-123). The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., a/nd Guerry, J., oonewr. Stonewall H. Dyer, for plaintiff in error. Stanford Arnold, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of possessing whisky in violation of the prohibition law (Code, §§ 58-101-58-123). The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., a/nd Guerry, J., oonewr. Stonewall H. Dyer, for plaintiff in error. Stanford Arnold, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Ga. App. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-state-gactapp-1940.