McKnight v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McKnight v. State

61 Ga. App. 605

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 31, 1940·No. 28019·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of possessing whisky in violation of the prohibition law (Code, §§ 58-101-58-123). The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., a/nd Guerry, J., oonewr. Stonewall H. Dyer, for plaintiff in error. Stanford Arnold, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of possessing whisky in violation of the prohibition law (Code, §§ 58-101-58-123). The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., a/nd Guerry, J., oonewr. Stonewall H. Dyer, for plaintiff in error. Stanford Arnold, solicitor, contra.

McKnight v. State, 61 Ga. App. 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

61 Ga. App. 605 (McKnight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.