McKnight v. Sachs
This text of 9 A.D.2d 960 (McKnight v. Sachs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by the vendees named in a contract for the purchase and sale of real property for specific performance, the vendor named in said contract interposed a counterclaim for rents collected by the vendees. The appeal is from so much of an order as denied the vendees’ motion for summary judg[961]*961ment striking out the answer and counterclaim (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.2d 960, 196 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-sachs-nyappdiv-1959.