McKnight v. Petersen ex rel. L.P.
137 S. Ct. 2241, 198 L. Ed. 2d 677, 85 U.S.L.W. 3577, 2017 WL 661750, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3866
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 12, 2017
DocketNo. 16–1003.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 137 S. Ct. 2241 (McKnight v. Petersen ex rel. L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McKnight v. Petersen ex rel. L.P., 137 S. Ct. 2241, 198 L. Ed. 2d 677, 85 U.S.L.W. 3577, 2017 WL 661750, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3866 (U.S. 2017).
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of White v. Pauly, 580 U.S. ----,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hughes v. Kisela
862 F.3d 775 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 2241, 198 L. Ed. 2d 677, 85 U.S.L.W. 3577, 2017 WL 661750, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-petersen-ex-rel-lp-scotus-2017.