McKnight v. Lynaugh
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-21035 Conference Calendar __________________
JOHNNY MCKNIGHT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JAMES A. LYNAUGH, Director, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-846 - - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Johnny McKnight appeals the dismissal as frivolous of his
civil rights complaint which challenged the prison's integration
of two-cell housing as violative of his right under the First
Amendment. Because McKnight's right to exercise freely his
religious beliefs is outweighed by a legitimate penal interest,
the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the
claim as frivolous. See Muhammad v. Lynaugh, 966 F.2d 901, 902
(5th Cir. 1992).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-21035 -2-
McKnight's other issues -- alleged contravention of a
district court order in another case, consideration of additional
claims which McKnight failed to amend to his complaint, and the
lack of notice and opportunity to cure deficiencies before the 28
U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal -- have been considered. We conclude
that they are without merit.
McKnight's motions for transfer and for default are DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKnight v. Lynaugh (McKnight v. Lynaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.