McKnight v. Denouvion
This text of 22 La. Ann. 373 (McKnight v. Denouvion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant moves to dismiss this appeal, taken by the plaintiff, on the following grounds, viz:
First — There is no order of appeal.
Second — The judge did not fix the amount of the appeal bond.
Third — The surety on the injunction bond has not been made party to the appeal.
We find in the record the following motion for appeal:
“ Now, by her counsel, comes the plaintiff, and moves the court for a suspensive appeal from the judgment rendered in the above cause, returnable to the Supreme Court second Monday of April, 1870.”
(Signed) “ Cullom & Walsh,”
“of Counsel.”
The motion evidently does not contain an order of appeal.
[374]*374We find no order of appeal in the record. The mere filing of a motion for appeal with, an appeal bond, does not divest the court below of jurisdiction and invest the same in this court. The order of appeal is essential, it matters not in what form the application is made — whether by motion or by petition.
Let the appeal be dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 La. Ann. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-denouvion-la-1870.