McKnight v. Bank of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKnight v. Bank of New York

227 A.D. 817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.D. 817 (McKnight v. Bank of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKnight v. Bank of New York, 227 A.D. 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order entered herein. In our opinion, the trust here is revocable, and the decision is, therefore, correct under the principle laid down in Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Co. (162 App. Div. 607). The decision is based upon this ground only. Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Rich, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order entered herein. In our opinion, the trust here is revocable, and the decision is, therefore, correct under the principle laid down in Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Co. (162 App. Div. 607). The decision is based upon this ground only. Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Rich, J., concurs in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-bank-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack