McKire v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKire v. McDonough

937 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432, 2006 WL 2482455

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-3735

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 937 So. 2d 721 (McKire v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKire v. McDonough, 937 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432, 2006 WL 2482455 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. The record establishes that the petitioner was afforded procedural due process and that the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, observed the essential requirements of the law. See Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So.2d 679, 682 (Fla.2000); Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. The record establishes that the petitioner was afforded procedural due process and that the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, observed the essential requirements of the law. See Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So.2d 679, 682 (Fla.2000); Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

937 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432, 2006 WL 2482455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckire-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack