McKinzy v. State
This text of 949 So. 2d 1153 (McKinzy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthrone McKINZY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Anthrone McKinzy, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We dismiss the appeal from the denial on the merits of a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) as from a non-appealable order. See Clewis v. State, 715 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(an order denying a timely motion for reduction of sentence is not an appealable order); Dixon v. State, 616 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Ziegler v. State, 380 So.2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The dismissal is without prejudice to McKinzy filing those claims which are cognizable via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
949 So. 2d 1153, 2007 WL 601962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinzy-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.