McKinzy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKinzy v. State

209 So. 2d 701, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 30, 1968

DocketNo. 67-722

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 So. 2d 701 (McKinzy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinzy v. State, 209 So. 2d 701, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 So. 2d 701, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinzy-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack