McKinzy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKinzy v. State

209 So. 2d 701, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1968·No. No. 67-722·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

Affirmed.

McKinzy v. State, 209 So. 2d 701, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

209 So. 2d 701 (McKinzy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related