McKinzie v. McCrory

40 So. 483, 88 Miss. 86
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 So. 483 (McKinzie v. McCrory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinzie v. McCrory, 40 So. 483, 88 Miss. 86 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

Cali-toon, L,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellees obtained an injunction restraining appellants from trespassing on land, cutting valuable shade trees, moving fences and obstructing a right of way. The court below refused to dissolve the injunction on motion, with affidavits on each side. The affidavits are in sharp conflict. A grave question of right and title appears here, important damage not remediable anight ensue on dissolution, and we think the court properly held the injunction. until full investigation on evidence in regular course. Alcorn v. Sadler, 66 Miss., 221 (5 South. Rep., 694).

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 483, 88 Miss. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinzie-v-mccrory-miss-1906.