McKinzie v. Fellows

Mississippi Supreme Court

McKinzie v. Fellows

57 So. 574, 101 Miss. 226

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 So. 574 (McKinzie v. Fellows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinzie v. Fellows, 57 So. 574, 101 Miss. 226 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree in this case was rendered on the 26th day of April, 1911, and the appeal bond was executed and filed on the 12th day of June, 1911. Under sections 4902 and 4906 of the Code of 1906, the transcript of the record should have been filed in this court on or before the third Monday (15'th) of January, 1912. This the clerk of the lower court failed to do, and on the 27th day of January, 1912, this motion to docket and dismiss was filed.' Thereafter, on the 31st day of January, 1912, the transcript of the record was filed with the clerk of this' [227]*227court. The clerk of the lower court had' until the third Monday of January, 1912, in which to file the transcript of the record in this court, and appellant could have done nothing to compel him to file it earlier than that date. "When he failed to file the transcript of the record on the third Monday of January, appellant could then have moved for a writ of certiorari directing him to send up the record; hut such a writ would not have obtained the record much, if any, earlier than the date on which it was, in fact, filed in this court.

Consequently appellant was not in fault in the matter, and the motion to docket and dismiss is overruled. See McAlester v. Richardson, 57 South. 547, this day decided. Overruled and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree in this case was rendered on the 26th day of April, 1911, and the appeal bond was executed and filed on the 12th day of June, 1911. Under sections 4902 and 4906 of the Code of 1906, the transcript of the record should have been filed in this court on or before the third Monday (15'th) of January, 1912. This the clerk of the lower court failed to do, and on the 27th day of January, 1912, this motion to docket and dismiss was filed.' Thereafter, on the 31st day of January, 1912, the transcript of the record was filed with the clerk of this' [227]*227court. The clerk of the lower court had' until the third Monday of January, 1912, in which to file the transcript of the record in this court, and appellant could have done nothing to compel him to file it earlier than that date. "When he failed to file the transcript of the record on the third Monday of January, appellant could then have moved for a writ of certiorari directing him to send up the record; hut such a writ would not have obtained the record much, if any, earlier than the date on which it was, in fact, filed in this court.

Consequently appellant was not in fault in the matter, and the motion to docket and dismiss is overruled. See McAlester v. Richardson, 57 South. 547, this day decided. Overruled and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 So. 574, 101 Miss. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinzie-v-fellows-miss-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack